Failure to properly measure and control relative humidity in the
cleanroom can result in lower yields, increased scrap and waste,
contaminated product inadvertently reaching consumers, customer lines
down, increased liabilities, and decreased revenues—among other
situations best avoided. Carefully monitoring and controlling the
relative humidity in a cleanroom is an absolute requirement—with no
options.
Particulate count. Temperature. Airflow. Humidity. These five words are
among the environmental factors that must be measured and controlled in
the cleanroom environment. Sometimes the ‘stickiest’ of these is
humidity. Measuring and controlling it within prescribed parameters can
be a challenge. Too little or too much RH can impact much more than the
personal comfort of cleanroom employees. Too little humidity can be
quite electrifying—creating issues of static build-up and discharge. Too
much humidity brings its own woes: encouraging the growth of bacteria
and microbes, corroding sensitive metals whether in products or
equipment, and manifesting itself in moisture condensation and water
absorption. Then there’s photolithographic degradation. Photoresist
processes are among the most sensitive to humidity, and can be among
the most costly to control for, due to their tightly required
parameters. The bottom line: any of these conditions can result in cost
overruns, scrapped products, and shortened equipment life. In short, the
diminution of cleanroom performance, which is costly in itself.
Simply put, because humidity is relative to temperature, controlling RH
within very tight tolerances or at extremely low levels can end up
costing you more money in both construction and operating budgets. It’s
important to understand that target humidity and temperature control
decisions impact costs. A cleanroom target temperature of 65 degrees
will have a lower relative humidity than a target temperature of 60
degrees. The lower your controlled temperature goes, more is required to
“dry out” the air to reach a set RH level. Driving lower moisture
content drives cost.
No comments:
Post a Comment